Pro Se Rights

​

Help Send ten(10) people from around the nation go to D.C. and speak before Congress to Help Reform the Family and Civil Law Courts: Stop Corruption and Abuse Towards Pro Se Litigants. The Abuse of Process Prevention and/or Pro Se Legal Abuse Act

 

Tim Shiling(PA), Christian Stahl(PA), Lillie Coley(NJ), Lynne Morgan( Ohio), Wanda Satterthwaite(PA) and Rymir Satterthwaite (involved with High Profile Case, See Link https://bit.ly/2RpfiR7 and No Due Process Blog https://nodueprocess12.blogspot.com/2021/

 

No Due Process – Denied the 14th Amendment in order to favor one party such as no discovery of disputed facts. Violation of free speech.

 

People Across the Nation Are Having Similar Constitutional Problems and Civil Rights Issues , With Bad Attorneys

 

We are seeking to introduce new legislation, such as Pro Se or Legal Abuse Act, to help others avoid experiencing the blatant disregard of human rights with the Judiciary System and/or corrupt attorneys within our states across the nation.

​

An act to prevent courts, attorneys, and others from abusing court rules and legal processes in ways that either deprive litigants—particularly pro se litigants in civil or family court—of their constitutional rights, or that otherwise deny them fair access to justice.

​

WHEREAS, in the courts of this State and Nation, systemic classism and racism are frequently on display. Too often, access to justice is contingent upon access to financial resources.

​

WHEREAS, pro se litigants in civil and family court are particularly susceptible to abuse of process, as is the working class.

​

WHEREAS, the American legal system was originally intended to be simple enough for individuals to achieve justice while representing themselves. However, the law has grown so complex and multi-faceted that, regardless of a claim’s merits, attorneys and litigation strategies are now necessary.

​

WHEREAS, large corporations, wealthy individuals, and their high-priced attorneys often take advantage of legal rules and court processes in an effort to squash, intimidate, or otherwise place undue burdens upon public interest lawyers, sole practitioners, small firms, and pro se litigants. These strategies drive up the costs of litigation, crowd the courts’ dockets, obfuscate the issues before the courts, forestall discovery, and prevent judges from reaching the merits of a claim.

​

WHEREAS, beyond preventing fair access to justice, these strategies often result in injustices of their own, including meritless sanctions and denials of discovery. Further, they open the door for fraud, misrepresentations, concealment of evidence, corruption, and more; amidst the strategic deluges, dishonesty and downright illegality often go unnoticed.

​

WHEREAS, because the legal industry is both self-regulating and a tight-knit community, bringing dishonest, corrupt, or illegal behavior perpetrated by attorneys or judges to light is often impossible, particularly for pro se litigants.

​

WHEREAS, in states where judges are elected, these dishonest or illegal tactics and behaviors are even more of a problem. Elected judges are demonstrably influenced by campaign contributors and political benefactors.

​

WHEREAS, attorneys often make campaign contributions to the judges before whom they appear, yet this information is difficult to track down, particularly for pro se litigants.

​

WHEREAS, for reasons that have nothing to do with a case’s merits, judges and court employees are often dismissive of or—worse—hostile towards pro se claims.

​

WHEREAS, removing unfit judges from the bench is close to impossible. Further, in the name of zealous advocacy, the code of legal ethics all but forgives dishonest or otherwise abusive attorneys, even when they make a mockery of our system of justice.

​

WHEREAS, access to justice is a bedrock of our republic. Without equal and fair access to the courts and the justice that they are supposed to guarantee, the American system crumbles.

 

 

Section 1. Any person who violates a person rights after having time to correct their error but does not do so will be investigated by separate Federal Public Legal Abuse Committee.

 

Section 2.  Any person who violates a person rights to fairness in a court of law will be sanction and removed from office.

 

Section 3. To seek an independent Board who will provided oversight of “Oath Breakers”.  To review files for accuracy and authenticity and report on these findings to agencies necessary and public.

 

Section 4. Add a penalty clause in Title 42 for violation of a judge's oath of office and back it up in Article V of the Pa. Constitution.

 

4.1 Add a government immunity exception to allow citizens to sue for injunctive and declaratory relief.  Abolish per curiam orders.  Make judges sign orders.

 

Section 5. Remove discretionary language from the code.  For example instead of a judge may a judge shall.  

​

5.1 Abolish campaign finance contributions from lawyers to judges.  Judges are funded by the lawyers who appear before them.  This is sort of like having the tobacco industry solely fund the FDA). Abolish "retention votes"  make judges run for office.

 

Section 6. Put video in the courtrooms and allow public access and allow parties to Seal Records when allegations of crime arises.

 

Section 7.  Electronically publish decisions, statistics and judge/lawyer associations.   For example a Judge who is running for retention but there is no record of her rulings published anywhere. 

 

Section 8.  Take Judicial Discipline out of the Judiciary and put it with the Ethics Commission.   End the Senior Judge program, make them retire.

 

Section 9.  Reform family court and enable pro se litigants to get answers that is accurate and right. The complexity of the law should not require a lawyer.

 

Section 10.   Make all family court orders immediately appealable as of right (interim, temporary interlocutory orders allow and engender abuse). Review what shakes out of the courts for a year and see where further improvements could be made.

 

Section 11. Take “conflict” out of custody (HB 1397 presumption is of shared custody).

Also, take “conflict” out of support but base it on need after a person's reasonable expenditures: (rent, mortgage, car, food, clothing, a few discretionary dollars) and ACTUAL earnings not theoretical "earnings' capacities.

 

Section 12. Abolish Title IV - D and E - this is an incentive for bad behavior.  The DRO needs to be shuttered.  Some Counties are manufacturing imbalanced outcomes to generate child support reimbursement incentives.  Family asset fleecing and forfeiture.

​

​

THEREFORE, be it enacted by legislation of the State of (your state):

 

*******************

​

Comments:

​

Many have experienced abusive power when non-parties were added to cases illegally; states’ judges were taking bribes from rich clients; the concealment of evidence; and jurisdiction fraud, with parties giving false statements about their contacts with the state, which was ignored by judges. Trial and appeal judges have committed obstruction of justice by withholding records, with court audio being altered or destroyed.

​

Judges are using the Hearsay Rule from a gossip magazine as a Rule of Law, which was used to illegally sanction parties for attorney fees, along with parties asking for court records on appeal, which also led to sanctions for illegally attorney fees .

 

 A judge called a disabled party at home while she was recovering from surgery to harass her, and an attorney stated this judge was taking bribes. 

​

Many are stripped of our assets, our familial bonds, and our dignity. We are deprived of our fundamental rights. We learn jurists have interpreted the Eleventh (11th) Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as providing them with complete immunity from suit, from harm done with malice, and from injunctive relief to stop harm in progress. We learn the other amendments protecting our fundamental rights are not important. 

 

So, now we introduce new legislation to protect the rights of Pro Se Litigants from bad judges and attorneys who seek to corrupt the judicial system.

​